Sacred Heart
W-L: (14-27) PR = 93.3808Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 927 A Providence (12-25, 94.0) 1- 6 927 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 2- 4 1003 A RPI AC ( 7-28, 93.6) 3- 1 1004 H RPI AC ( 7-28, 93.6) 0- 4 1010 H Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 2- 4 1010 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 0- 1 1011 H Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 6- 2 1011 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 3- 1 1017 A Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 2- 3 1018 A Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 0- 2 1024 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 6- 1 1025 H Boston College (17-19, 94.8) 6- 0 1031 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 1- 4 1101 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 1- 3 1118 A Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 0- 3 1121 A LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 5- 1 1122 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 2- 4 1128 H Yale AC (25- 9, 97.2) 0- 5 1129 A Minnesota State HA (18-19, 96.6) 0- 2 1202 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 1- 2 1205 H Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 2- 2 1206 A Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 2- 4 102 H Minnesota HA (24-12, 98.4) 0- 4 103 H Minnesota HA (24-12, 98.4) 2- 4 109 A Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 2- 3 109 A LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 1- 4 110 A Franklin Pierce WHA (23-14, 94.2) 1- 3 110 A LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 0- 4 116 H Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 1- 4 117 H Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 2- 2 117 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 0- 4 123 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 5- 2 124 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 3- 1 130 A Vermont (16-20, 94.8) 3- 2 131 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 3- 1 206 A Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 3- 2 207 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 1- 0 213 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 3- 1 214 A LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 0- 1 220 A Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 4- 3 221 H Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 2- 3 227 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 2- 3 228 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 1- 3
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
927 A Providence 1- 6 -5 -1 -- -4.01
927 A Saint Anselm 2- 4 -2 -1 -1.14
1003 A RPI 3- 1 2 -1 + 2.57
1004 H RPI 0- 4 -4 0 -- -4.20
1010 H Franklin Pierce 2- 4 -2 0 -1.60
1011 H Franklin Pierce 6- 2 4 0 ++ 4.40
1011 H LIU 3- 1 2 1 1.32
1017 A Stonehill 2- 3 -1 -1 -0.29
1018 A Stonehill 0- 2 -2 -1 -1.29
1024 H Saint Anselm 6- 1 5 0 ++ 5.09
1025 H Boston College 6- 0 6 -1 +++ 7.07
1031 A Saint Anselm 1- 4 -3 -1 - -2.14
1101 A Saint Anselm 1- 3 -2 -1 -1.14
1118 A Post 0- 3 -3 1 - -3.66
1121 A LIU 5- 1 4 0 ++ 4.10
1122 H LIU 2- 4 -2 1 - -2.68
1128 H Yale 0- 5 -5 -3 -1.60
1129 A Minnesota State 0- 2 -2 -4 1.63
1202 H Post 1- 2 -1 1 - -2.44
1205 H Assumption 2- 2 0 0 0.14
1206 A Assumption 2- 4 -2 -1 -1.09
102 H Minnesota 0- 4 -4 -5 0.60
103 H Minnesota 2- 4 -2 -5 + 2.60
109 A Franklin Pierce 2- 3 -1 -1 0.17
109 A LIU 1- 4 -3 0 - -2.90
110 A Franklin Pierce 1- 3 -2 -1 -0.83
110 A LIU 0- 4 -4 0 - -3.90
116 H Stonehill 1- 4 -3 0 - -3.06
117 H Stonehill 2- 2 0 0 -0.06
117 H Saint Anselm 0- 4 -4 0 - -3.91
123 H Saint Anselm 5- 2 3 0 + 3.09
124 H Saint Anselm 3- 1 2 0 + 2.09
130 A Vermont 3- 2 1 -2 + 2.76
131 A Saint Anselm 3- 1 2 -1 + 2.86
206 A Post 3- 2 1 1 0.34
213 H LIU 3- 1 2 1 1.32
220 A Assumption 4- 3 1 -1 1.91
221 H Assumption 2- 3 -1 0 -0.86
227 A Saint Anselm 2- 3 -1 -1 -0.14
228 A Saint Anselm 1- 3 -2 -1 -1.14
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 927 A Providence 1- 6 -5 -1 -- -4.01 1004 H RPI 0- 4 -4 0 -- -4.20 1031 A Saint Anselm 1- 4 -3 -1 - -2.14 1118 A Post 0- 3 -3 1 - -3.66 1122 H LIU 2- 4 -2 1 - -2.68 1202 H Post 1- 2 -1 1 - -2.44 109 A LIU 1- 4 -3 0 - -2.90 110 A LIU 0- 4 -4 0 - -3.90 116 H Stonehill 1- 4 -3 0 - -3.06 117 H Saint Anselm 0- 4 -4 0 - -3.91 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1025 H Boston College 6- 0 6 -1 +++ 7.07 1011 H Franklin Pierce 6- 2 4 0 ++ 4.40 1024 H Saint Anselm 6- 1 5 0 ++ 5.09 1121 A LIU 5- 1 4 0 ++ 4.10 1003 A RPI 3- 1 2 -1 + 2.57 103 H Minnesota 2- 4 -2 -5 + 2.60 123 H Saint Anselm 5- 2 3 0 + 3.09 124 H Saint Anselm 3- 1 2 0 + 2.09 130 A Vermont 3- 2 1 -2 + 2.76 131 A Saint Anselm 3- 1 2 -1 + 2.86 |
Sacred Heart Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | Sacred Heart | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 1) | Sacred Heart | |
| Lindenwood | Lindenwood | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Lindenwood | |
| Mercyhurst | Mercyhurst | Mercyhurst | ||
| Penn State | Penn State | insuffient: ( 0- 0)( 1- 0) | Penn State | |
| RIT | RIT | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | RIT | |
| Robert Morris | Robert Morris | tied - ( 2- 5) ( 2- 2) | Robert Morris | |
| Syracuse | Syracuse | Syracuse 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Brown | Brown | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 1) | Brown | |
| Clarkson | Clarkson | Clarkson 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Colgate | Colgate | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 1) | Colgate | |
| Cornell | Cornell | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Cornell | |
| Dartmouth | Dartmouth | insuffient: ( 3- 8)( 2- 4) | Dartmouth | |
| Harvard | Harvard | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 1) | Harvard | |
| Princeton | Princeton | Princeton 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac 3- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| RPI | RPI | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 1) | RPI | |
| St. Lawrence | St. Lawrence | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 2) | St. Lawrence | |
| Union | Union | insuffient: ( 3- 5)( 2- 1) | Union | |
| Yale | Yale | Yale | ||
| Boston College | Sacred Heart | Sacred Heart | ||
| Boston University | Boston University | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 1- 2) | Boston University | |
| Connecticut | Connecticut | Connecticut 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Holy Cross | Holy Cross | Holy Cross 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Maine | Maine | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 1- 2) | Maine | |
| Merrimack | Merrimack | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 3) | Merrimack | |
| New Hampshire | New Hampshire | New Hampshire 4- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Northeastern | Northeastern | Northeastern 4- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Providence | Providence | Providence | ||
| Vermont | Sacred Heart | Sacred Heart | ||
| Assumption | Assumption | Assumption | ||
| Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| LIU | LIU | LIU | ||
| Post | Sacred Heart | insuffient: ( 3- 7)( 2- 5) | Sacred Heart | |
| Saint Anselm | Saint Anselm | Saint Anselm | ||
| St.Michael's | St.Michael's | St.Michael's | ||
| Stonehill | Stonehill | Stonehill | ||
| Bemidji State | Bemidji State | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Bemidji State | |
| Minnesota | Minnesota | Minnesota | ||
| Minnesota Duluth | Minnesota Duluth | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 1) | Minnesota Duluth | |
| Minnesota State | Minnesota State | Minnesota State | ||
| Ohio State | Ohio State | Ohio State 2- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| St. Cloud State | St. Cloud State | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 1) | St. Cloud State | |
| St. Thomas | St. Thomas | St. Thomas 2- 2 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin | Wisconsin 3- 1 vs 0- 2 |
PowerWise = 4
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 36.18
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Providence (12-25, 94.0) 1- 6 -5.91 2.02 0.39 0.84 -2.33
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 2- 4 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.84 -2.38
0 A RPI ( 7-28, 93.6) 3- 1 -6.33 1.60 0.39 0.84 3.34
0 H RPI ( 7-28, 93.6) 0- 4 -6.33 1.60 -0.39 0.84 -2.83
0 H Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 2- 4 -5.73 2.20 -0.39 0.84 -2.57
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 0- 1 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.84 -3.03
0 H Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 6- 2 -5.73 2.20 -0.39 0.84 3.05
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 3- 1 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.84 1.24
0 A Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 2- 3 -6.19 1.74 0.39 0.84 -2.44
0 A Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 0- 2 -6.19 1.74 0.39 0.84 -2.44
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 6- 1 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.84 2.53
0 H Boston College (17-19, 94.8) 6- 0 -5.06 2.87 -0.39 0.84 4.19
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 1- 4 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.84 -2.38
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 1- 3 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.84 -2.38
0 A Post (11-28, 92.3) 0- 3 -7.57 1.00 0.39 0.84 -3.02
0 A LIU (18-19, 93.1) 5- 1 -6.81 1.12 0.39 0.84 2.54
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 2- 4 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.84 -3.03
0 H Yale (25- 9, 97.2) 0- 5 -2.73 5.20 -0.39 0.84 -1.31
0 A Minnesota Stat (18-19, 96.6) 0- 2 -3.27 4.66 0.39 0.84 -1.21
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 1- 2 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.84 -3.35
0 H Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 2- 2 -6.00 1.94 -0.39 0.84 203.43
0 A Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 2- 4 -6.00 1.94 0.39 0.84 -2.36
0 H Minnesota (24-12, 98.4) 0- 4 -1.54 6.40 -0.39 0.84 -0.81
0 H Minnesota (24-12, 98.4) 2- 4 -1.54 6.40 -0.39 0.84 -0.81
0 A Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 2- 3 -5.73 2.20 0.39 0.84 -2.25
0 A LIU (18-19, 93.1) 1- 4 -6.81 1.12 0.39 0.84 -2.70
0 A Franklin Pierc (23-14, 94.2) 1- 3 -5.73 2.20 0.39 0.84 -2.25
0 A LIU (18-19, 93.1) 0- 4 -6.81 1.12 0.39 0.84 -2.70
0 H Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 1- 4 -6.19 1.74 -0.39 0.84 -2.77
0 H Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 2- 2 -6.19 1.74 -0.39 0.84 203.43
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 0- 4 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.84 -2.70
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 5- 2 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.84 2.53
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 3- 1 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.84 2.53
0 A Vermont (16-20, 94.8) 3- 2 -5.15 2.78 0.39 0.84 5.33
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 3- 1 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.84 3.83
0 A Post (11-28, 92.3) 3- 2 -7.57 1.00 0.39 0.84 2.33
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 1- 0 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.84 1.03
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 3- 1 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.84 1.24
0 A LIU (18-19, 93.1) 0- 1 -6.81 1.12 0.39 0.84 -2.70
0 A Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 4- 3 -6.00 1.94 0.39 0.84 3.91
0 H Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 2- 3 -6.00 1.94 -0.39 0.84 -2.68
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 2- 3 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.84 -2.38
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 1- 3 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.84 -2.38
------
382.30
|
winning pts = 39.6323 losing points = -64.1971
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------